Give me a break. Do you really believe that this msg is appropriate for the NANOG mailing list? If you want to talk to Alternet, then talk to Alternet directly. -- Enke
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 12:59:53 -0700 (MST) From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON@ACES.COM> To: nanog@merit.edu CC: GAVRON@ACES.COM
A customer of mine owns a cidr block they haven't been using.
They've asked me to advertise it. I note that this block is being advertised by an ALTERNET customer.
The nic / radb agree with my customer: HEARTS:[GAVRON.INTERNET]_whois 204.193.128.0 B3 Corporation (NETBLK-B3NET-EC) 2521 W. Arnold St. Marshfield, WI 54449
Netname: B3NET-EC Netblock: 204.193.128.0 - 204.193.159.0
Note that the ``unscrupulous other isp'' has gotten inverse: Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
NS.CYBERCONNECTION.COM 204.193.128.253
RADB says: route: 204.193.128.0/19 descr: US Cyber (sm) descr: 2451 W Arnold Street descr: Marshfield descr: WI 54449, USA origin: AS4136 comm-list: COMM_NSFNET advisory: AS690 1:4136 mnt-by: MAINT-AS4136 changed: nsfnet-admin@merit.edu 950505 source: RADB
But the route is being annouced by ``cyberconnection'' out of AS701.
Ideas? Should I just advertise this and to hell with the backbones?
Alternet?
Ehud