The problem with all this talk, especially with trusted international neutral organizations, is that once they bend they will never be trusted again.  Shutting off the routes, removing TLDs (or keeping them because of politics), etc will cause irreparable damage to these organizations.  Bowing to governments, politics, etc does not have a path back from future control.
This is a recommendation that will only hurt people (China, North Korea, [even the USA], etc all do this to control their people).  Governments will get around whatever the limitations are, it may take them time and resources but they will get around it.  Freedom of information is the only way to help people understand the reality of what is going on in the world (galaxy, universe, etc).

Brian
Technological solutions for Sociological problems

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+briansupport=hotmail.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:23 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Ukraine request yikes
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 3/1/22 4:08 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> See .SU.
>
> (SU was moved from allocated to "transitionally reserved” back when the
> USSR broke up. My recollection is that an agreement was reached by which
> .SU users would be migrated out to appropriate new ccTLDs, that is, the
> ccTLDs based on ISO codes created for former Soviet republics, and no new
> entries would be added to .SU. However, when ICANN tried to propose a plan
> to finalize removing .SU from the root (around 2006 or so), the operators
> of .SU reopened registrations and complained to the US Dept. of Commerce,
> who were overseeing ICANN performance of the IANA Functions contract.
> Eventually, the Russian government was able to convince ISO-3166/MA to move
> SU to “exceptionally reserved” (like UK, EU, and a number of others) and
> forward motion on removing .SU from the root essentially ceased.)

I know someone (non-Russian) using .su for a funny name ending in .su.  This
is non-political and caters only to an English speaking audience.  These were
registered in the last few years, so they are still open and taking the
registrations.

I would ask what of .ly used for various URL shorteners, and .kp or .cn?  All
these are representing evil countries too, why do they get a pass.  I'm
certain they would argue .us should be revoked for the same.

This would break connectivity, and that's a bad thing.
- --
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KK8e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----