On 10/8/16, Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
On 07/10/2016 17:59, Lee wrote:
On 10/7/16, Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
dunno about creating web pages, but https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=785 has a section on showing filters that are defined but not referenced & referenced but not defined In IOS-XR it is one command "sho rpl unused ?" RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused ? as-path-set Display as-path-set objects community-set Display community-set objects extcommunity-set Display extended community objects
On 07/10/2016 00:33, Lee wrote: prefix-set Display prefix-set objects rd-set Display rd-set objects route-policy Display route-policy objects tag-set Display tag-set objects
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:petach-tikva-gp#show rpl unused prefix Fri Oct 7 08:24:53.237 IDT
ACTIVE -- Referenced by at least one policy which is attached INACTIVE -- Only referenced by policies which are not attached UNUSED -- Not attached (directly or indirectly) and not referenced I'm actually starting to miss being out of the game. I'm retired, so don't have access to anything running IOS-XR. Just out of curiosity, how does the output of 'show rpl unused prefix' compare to the output of the script at http://pastebin.com/pem7tHAJ
Thanks, Lee
Samples:
<.. snip samples ..> interesting.. thanks!
Note the sloppy code - sometimes they state UNUSED and sometimes (UNUSED). Or "the following policies are"... rather than "the following routing policies are". Just plain sloppy Cisco coding and poor QA. And once you delete these unreferenced objects, "show rpl unused" will still show them since there is a bug in Cisco code (CSCuy07932/CSCug9153). See: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/192481 for details.
Which is why I like having the source code -- there's the possibility of fixing whatever myself instead of having to wait for the vendor to fix it :) Thanks, Lee