12 Jan
2024
12 Jan
'24
12:34 p.m.
* aychen@avinta.com (Abraham Y. Chen) [Fri 12 Jan 2024, 13:09 CET]:
EzIP proposes that 240/4 be used like 10.64/10 in CG-NAT. which is reusable for each isolated geographical area. Thus, there is no "Burn-rate" to talk about.
You have posted this statement like five times now in the past two days. Who is asking for this expansion of 100.64/10 (which you misspelled, by the way)? Where are the claims that the amount of private space behind a CGNAT is the limiting factor in CGNAT deployments? [five meters of superfluous quote history snipped] -- Niels.