5 Jul
2016
5 Jul
'16
1:27 a.m.
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
The two other technologies mentioned do the same as MAP more or less, but both requires carrier NAT, which is expensive for the ISP and has a lack of control as seen from the end user point of view (no port forwarding etc).
What it does however, is make things like GRE work. Some are surprised that there is actually non A+P protocols being used by customers. For instance legacy PPTP uses this, so some business VPNs run into problem with MAP or LW4o6. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se