27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
10:40 a.m.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
It's a waste, even if we're "planning for the future", no one house needs a /64 sitting on their lan.. or at least none I can sensibly think of o_O.
Okay, I'm just curious, what size do you (and other's of similar opinion) think the IPv6 space _should_ have been in order to allow us to not have to jump through conservation hoops ever again? 128 bits isn't enough, clearly, 256? 1k? 10k? -- Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442 Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross