Which is fine and all (being that it's on-topic). My main beef is that a certain person can't take a hint. Using an 'anonymous' re-mailer to try and get people to read nothing more than copy/paste, and then 5 billion 'references' (most of which use asinine 'docs.google.com' references instead of the actual document) strikes me as unprofessional at the least, if not infantile. I'd have thought he'd have learned the last 50 times he got smacked down for this. But of course, I'm just an ignorant American! :) Ken Matlock Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare (303) 467-4671 matlockk@exempla.org -----Original Message----- From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jeroen@unfix.org] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:31 PM To: Matlock, Kenneth L Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: OpenFlow On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your spam, and forget to remove your .sig
Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the opposite!)
And also, there is a nice agenda item at NANOG50; http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/abstracts.php?pt=MTY2OSZuYW5vZzUw& nm=nanog50 8<----------------------------------------------------------------- Track: Open Flow Nick McKeown, Stanford University; Matt Davy, Indiana University Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM Abstract: OpenFlow: An Update [..] OpenFlow Trials and Deployments ----------------------------------------------------------------->8 Thus as it is a NANOG-ish topic, I wonder why somebody needs to hide. Greets, Jeroen