Thank you Eric you are a genius, that has solved and issue that has plagued me for 3 years. the problem was exactly as you said over subscription of the 8 ports tied to 1 ASIC ________________________________ From: Eric Ortega <eric_ortega@mmi.net> To: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 9:51:43 AM Subject: Re: multicast nightmare #42 Depending on the model of blade there is an 8-to-1 over subscription on the 4500s. I have had all kinds of headaches with this myself. The 48 port SFP "gig" blade can only have 1 gig per each set of 8 ports. The aggregate ports are known as "gigaports". The layout is gigaport 1 = 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15 gigaport 2 = 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16 and so on. I bet that if add up the total bandwidth in each gigaport you might be over the "limit" Philip Lavine wrote:
I wish that was the case but the switch is a 4500 and the data rates are less than 100 mbps on a 1 gig blade/sup
________________________________ From: >Eric Ortega <eric_ortega@mmi.net>
To: Philip Lavine <source_route@yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 8:24:59 AM Subject: Re: multicast nightmare #42
Are you over subscribing either the link or the backplane of the switching device?
Philip Lavine wrote:
Please explain how this would be possible:
1 sender 1 mcast group 1 receiver ---------------- = no data loss
1 sender 1 mcast group 2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment -------------------- = data loss
--
Eric R. Ortega Network Engineer Midcontinent Communications 605.357.5720 eric_ortega@gmail.com
-- Eric R. Ortega Network Engineer Midcontinent Communications 605.357.5720 eric_ortega@gmail.com