17 Apr
2014
17 Apr
'14
11:56 p.m.
I think I got you to say "NAT" Matthew Kaufman (Sent from my iPhone)
On Apr 17, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Timothy Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 17, 2014 7:52 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
While you're at it, the document can explain to admins who have been burned, often more than once, by the pain of re-numbering internal services at static addresses how IPv6 without NAT will magically solve this problem.
If you're worried about that issue, either get your own end user assignment(s) from ARIN or use ULA internally and employ NAT-PT (prefix translation) at the perimeter. That's not even a hard question.