On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 20:51 -0400, Ray Soucy wrote:
DHCPv6 is a tool, just as SLAAC is a tool. IPv6 was designed to support both options because they both have valid use cases.
Yes, a thousand times yes.
You don't get to just say "I'm not going to implement this because I don't agree with it," which is what Google is doing in the case of Android.
Actually, you DO get to just say that. Anyone can, but especially something as big as Google. And if DHCPv6 turns out to be important enough to enough people, Android will lose market share and either fork, die or change its mind. It wouldn't be the first mobile platform to disappear into the sludge of history.
I honestly hope he collects himself and takes the time to respond, because it really is a problem.
Not for him, and apparently not for Google. It's only a problem for people that want to do DHCPv6 with Android clients. Whether that becomes a problem for Google is another matter. I certainly hope Google sees the light early. Their current stance is very disappointing. And it's odd to see someone at that level so comprehensively missing the point. For someone with the breadth of experience and jacked into the mother lode like Lorenzo - very unusual. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4 Old fingerprint: EC67 61E2 C2F6 EB55 884B E129 072B 0AF0 72AA 9882