Can anyone explain why we are being exposed to this? From either side? bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:56:43AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > If I may... I am in possesion of your certified letter > -AND- the signed acknowledgement that you received notice > that I have taken posession of said certified mail. > > please get your facts straight, esp. when making formal > replies to government inqueries. it can only strengthen > your case if you tell the truth.
Equally but differently untruthful in my case. Myself, I don't sit around my house all day, breathlessly anticipating a new missive from Dean.
-Bill
then what, pray tell, do you do to while away the hours? knit? route IP datagrams? carve elaborate totems from ancient redwoods? myself, I have taken up Portugese... such an expressive language.
my instruction in the email above was derived from reading the submitted comments to the DoC/NOI on securing the DNS. telling us lies is one thing, factual mis-statements to the goverment is something else and i fail to see how doing so helps ones cause.
in the event that anyone has doubts, I will be glad to scan and post the evidence. Dean, care to amend your statements?
--bill
-- Jeff Shultz