19 Apr
2002
19 Apr
'02
11:31 a.m.
now as to who's responsible, first off you have to understand that we block rfc1918-sourced packets at our AS boundary. (otherwise these numbers would be Much Higher
are you sure? i suspect they are windows 2000 systems behind NATs. so the dynamic update is for the 1918 address, but the packet source address has been natted into real space.
according to our border flow stats, not all of them get nat'd on the way here.