What is it about the architecture that makes it a preferred solution. I get that centralizing the user databases makes sense, but why the control plane. What benefit does that have?

-- Tom

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 2:17 PM <brian.johnson@netgeek.us> wrote:

The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency is dependent on the design, and equipment used. I’ve seen/done several designs for this using two different vendors equipment and two different BNG software stacks.

When I do a design for BNG from scratch, this is how I do it now. :)

As always… YMMV.

- Brian

On Mar 22, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Tom Mitchell <tmitchell@netelastic.com> wrote:

Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking, but it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the DP and CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make any sense?

Thanks!