On 06/17/2018 02:53 PM, Brad wrote:
While I agree there are unintended consequences every time advancements are made in relation to the security and stability of the Internet- I disagree we should be rejecting their implementations. Instead, we should innovate further.
I look forward to your innovations.
Just because end to end encryption causes bandwidth issues for a very small number users - then perhaps they could benefit the most by these changes with additional capacity.
I encourage you to invest billions of dollars in rural broadband capacity worldwide. The rest of us will thank you for your sacrifice. Lee
-Brad
Well, yes, there is, you simply have to break the end to end encryption Yes, (or) deny service by Policy (remains to evaluate who's happy with
-------- Original message --------From: Michael Hallgren <mh@xalto.net> Date: 6/17/18 11:14 (GMT-07:00) To: nanog@jack.fr.eu.org Cc: Matthew Petach <matt@petach.org>, nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Impacts of Encryption Everywhere (any solution?) Le 2018-06-17 12:40, nanog@jack.fr.eu.org a écrit : that).
Cheers, mh
On 06/17/2018 03:09 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
Except that if websites are set to HTTPS only, there's no option for disabling encryption on the client side.
Matt
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018, 14:47 <nanog@jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
Sadly, it's just falling on deaf ears. Silicon Valley will continue to
On 06/16/2018 10:13 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: think they know better than everyone else and people outside of that bubble will continue to be disadvantaged.
What, again ? Encryption is what is best for the most people. The few that will not use it can disable it.
No issue then.