At 07:11 04/04/01 +1000, Philip Smith wrote: It may also be the concerted effort of certain individuals who have been after the top 10-30 non-CIDRers. I know I have sent out dozens of emails to those ASes since Jan 1 and have gotten, in general, a positive response and many have fixed their systems. -Hank
If you look at the graphs though, the routing table growth stopped around the end of the year. I've seen 101k prefixes give or take a few hundred in my view since 31st December.... Also, the number of /24s being announced has stopped growing. It's been 58k5 for the last 3 months...
Routing table growth is following the state of the Internet economies? Looks like it to me.
philip --
At 13:15 02/04/2001 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I have a feeling this one may start another very large NANOG thread:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0402routing.html
-Hank