7 Oct
2002
7 Oct
'02
7:16 p.m.
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
It seems pretty obvious to me that if you have a an ethernet segment with multiple routers on it that adding a secondary IP to each one is more complicated and error-prone than adding it to one and having a dynamic routing protocol notify the rest of the routers on the segment.
They are dynamic routing protocols, not dynamic gateway-creation protocols. You're asking iBGP to create an interface. iBGP (and other dynamic routing protocols) don't do that. Pete -- Peter J. Templin, Jr., CCNP, CCDP Networking Consultant On-Line Internet Services - URDirect.net A division of Global On-Line Computers 5606 Randolph Blvd templin@urdirect.net San Antonio, TX 78233 (210)692-9911