On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
After a careful investigation, I am of the opinion that each of the following 18 ASNs was registered (via RIPE) with fradulent information purporting to represent the identity of the true registrant, and that in fact, all 18 of these ASNs were registered by a single party, apparently as part of a larger scheme to provide IP space to various snowshoe spammers.
Ronald, What is your goal here? Is there some action that any particular NANOG participant should take based on your opinion? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004