also check the steelhead isn't getting swamped by too many connections. The Units are rated at and have a fixed max number of connections per device.If you need more connections you need a bigger/more costly device. -- Martin Hepworth, CISSP Oxford, UK On 11 July 2013 18:14, Luan Nguyen <luan20176@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks guys.
We do have Riverbed Steelhead appliances at both end. According to calculation, maximum throughput can be attained is ~330KB/sec. With the Riverbed "cold" transfer, we should get ~600KB/sec. But I can only get ~250KB/sec with the Steelhead doing its stuff for 500M file so plenty of time for whatever to kick in. Iperf and netperf show great results though. I guess I will be sampling results hourly for comparison.
Regards,
-Luan
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com> wrote:
The maximum you can expect is:
Rate < (MSS/RTT)*(1 / sqrt(p)) where p is the probability of packet loss.
Credit: Mathis, Semke, Mahdavi & Ott in Computer Communication Review, 27(3), July 1997, titled The macroscopic behavior of the TCP congestion avoidance algorithm. (
http://www.infoblox.com/community/blog/tcp-performance-and-mathis-equation )
Joe
[image: Inactive hide details for Luan Nguyen ---07/11/2013 10:06:19 AM---Hello folks, Does anyone know what's the average speed for wi]Luan Nguyen ---07/11/2013 10:06:19 AM---Hello folks, Does anyone know what's
the
average speed for windows file transferring
From: Luan Nguyen <luan20176@gmail.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Date: 07/11/2013 10:06 AM Subject: File transfer speed between Hong Kong and Johannesburg, South Africa ------------------------------
Hello folks,
Does anyone know what's the average speed for windows file transferring (SMB2) between Hong Kong and Johannesburg? Any guide on how to calculate/estimate this?
Thanks.
Regards,
-Luan