-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Well... If you want to work on one, I'm willing help shepherd it through the process. We even have a working group setup for that purpose.
proposal for work in GROW?
Actually, that sounds reasonable -- if GROW [1] outcomes are heeded by the operations community. Historically, it seems, the Internet operations community picks and chooses the IETF RFCs/BCPs that each ISP implements on a "one-off" basis. Something (else) that I have long admired is the way the RIPE community has built working groups around critical issues. I'm still convinced that the NANOG community -- perhaps in collaboration with RIPE and APNIC, et al -- should work to craft ISP "best current practices" in these areas, since ISPs don't seem to heed IETF documents, except when it serves their own business & operational practices. - - ferg [1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/grow-charter.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHxMu8q1pz9mNUZTMRAk/wAJ9Mm3sWL9t1cCfy8sAhTd6DfxMIGwCfTauG 9lha9MMTiR4kPoPEHtBjfRQ= =atCM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/