At 07:01 PM 11/2/98 , Joe Shaw wrote:
I think moderating the group might not be such a bad idea. The only problem with this would be getting someone who had enough time to actually moderate the list. I don't know what is going on lately, but it seems egos and animosity are running rampant on both inet-access and nanog. I have been caught up in it myself, and for that I apologize.
i didn't, and don't, propose a moderated list. i propose a list with some sort of subscription requirement, at least for the ability post, that will only allow nano's to post. i also propose that the list be stringently policed. one warning re: content of your postings, then your ability to post is revoked. i'd like to see a list that lives up to the intent of the nanog list, but w/o all the useless drivel and chatter. if i wanted that, i'd still be subscribed to inet-access. -- Eric Kozowski eric@haydenisland.verio.net Non carborundum illigitimi