17 Jul
2011
17 Jul
'11
6:59 a.m.
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
Interesting, thnaks. It's not the vendors I would expect, and it's not based on SEND (which is not surprising at all and actually a good thing).
Personally I think SEND is never going to get any traction.
Is this actually secure in the sense that it ties addresses to specific ports for both sending and receiving? I'm asking because folks have built similar systems for IPv4 which weren't. The CLI screenshots look good, better than what most folks achieve with IPv4.
As far as I know, it's designed to work securely in an ETTH scenario, which implies both sending and receiving (if I understood you correctly). -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se