16 Sep
2019
16 Sep
'19
10:58 p.m.
And why are they not on any public peering exchange? Why only private?
On Sep 16, 2019, at 19:35, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
On Sep 16, 2019, at 17:48 , Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
1. Sprint peering battle. Google it 2. He.net peering battle. Google it. 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to peering, tech, ... we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good thing.
randy
Actually, their peering behavior in IPv4 is not quite as arrogant as it is in IPv6, so no, they aren’t doing parity.
Owen