27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
2:39 a.m.
On (2013-09-26 17:02 -0500), Jared Mauch wrote:
I certainly agree. There is a very narrow case for filtering 128 as it's a VPN attribute that should not be in the big-I Internet.
I can't think of application right now, but I'm not convinced there isn't application for 128 over INET. I know RFC strictly speaks about VPN deployment, but I wouldn't be too surprised if someone would have good use-case for tunneling attributes over INET. -- ++ytti