Isn't there some issue like MCI and Sprint not being at 4 common NAPs w/ UUNet? I know there is private peering going on, esp in St. Louis, but I think the blanket peering requirments that get exceptions (ala AGIS' 5 NAP requirement) are just a yard stick. If you aren't able to afford 800k/month, don't even bother (basically). Granted, those figures don't seem as horrible as they were about, oh, 4 years ago... -Deepak. On Mon, 12 May 1997, Christopher Morrell wrote:
Sean Donelan wrote:
DRA doesn't have large Web farms, but people build public libaries in the darndest places. I'm always amused by providers that have peering requirements their own networks, or existing 'peers' don't meet.
Do you feel that UUNET's own network doesn't meet the criteria set out in the press release? How so?
Which of UUNET's peers who are able to continue to peer with them, would you say do not follow the criteria set out in the press release?
Chris