And that's why C. should use a more appropriate example to defend his position. By this thread, I suspect, that whoever dealt with those different organization for OpenBSD & CARP, lacked the skills to accomplish the task and got shut down for being an ass. PS: Being of the Church of FreeBSD, I freely acknowledge that I got no clue about the scope of the drama that CARP was involved with. But I was aware of Cisco/VRRP/HSRP patent and CARP and found CIsco to be a bit of a bully to actually enforce it for such a simple technology. That being said, I was never attracted to OpenBSD for some "gut" reason... I know why now =D ----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 05/07/14 20:56, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2014 17:10:32 -0700, "Constantine A. Murenin" said:
Also, would you please be so kind as to finally explain to us why Google can squat on the https port with SPDY, Because it doesn't squat on the port. It politely asks "Do you speak SPDY, or just https?" and then listens to what the other end replies.