28 Nov
2004
28 Nov
'04
1:45 p.m.
--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:21 PM +0100 Henning Brauer <hb-nanog@bsws.de> wrote:
* Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net> [2004-11-28 13:13]:
Therefore I also agree with daniel that there is not really a problem with the 1 ASN == 1 IPv6 Prefix.
unless I miss something in that proposal that means that we'll see a dramatic increase in ASNs - I mean, it is not like only organizations with an ASN assigned have v4 space now. If they have their portable address space now, why should they suddenly accept that they had to renumber when changing providers?
Why should they go to v6 at all? Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.