29 Sep
2015
29 Sep
'15
10:26 a.m.
On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of sethm@rollernet.us> wrote:
On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)
We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring!
Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes.
~Seth Hi Seth, which market was this occurring? Was this already removed? I'm not seeing it this morning. I would like to figure out what went wrong here. We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused a situation like this.