21 Apr
2010
21 Apr
'10
1:29 a.m.
While I think this is an improvement, unless the distribution of ULA-C is no cheaper and no easier to get than GUA, I still think there is reason to believe that it is likely ULA-C will become de facto GUA over the long term. As such, I still think the current draft is a bad idea absent appropriate protections in RIR policy. Owen On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:34 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
and a very pleasant evening.
a few questions.
IPv6 on your radar? Looking at options for addressing your future v6 needs?
Have you looked at the IETF/ID in the subject line?
if you think something like this is a good idea, worth persuing, I'd like to hear from you.
--bill