On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, S. Ryan wrote:
Typical SORBS behavior. While this guy can demand all he wants, doesn't mean he will get what he wants or that he's right or wrong.
What's wrong with what Mat posted? The guy claiming DNS is regulated by federal law is an idiot. Not that I always agree with what Mat says, but the guy's claims are obviously and patently false. The claims, in fact, are so ridiculous that I tend to think he's making them to weasel out of solving the problem that got him listed in the first place. People doing that *deserve* to be publically ridiculed. When I talk to Mat I generally have no problems having a civil and productive discussion with him. But I don't start out with an attitude, and I don't cook up absurd stories to try to get out of fixing my spam problem. (Not that I have one, but if I did, I'd not try to weasel out of fixing it.)
Personally, we gave up using SORBS because of it's very high false-positive ratio
YMMV; at $DAYJOB we don't seem to have the same problem. Disclaimer: My opinions, not my boss's, etc. -- Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows Victorville, California PGP:0xE3AE35ED It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.