* Josh Richards <jrichard@cubicle.net> [20000831 17:43]:
* Kim Hubbard <kimh@arin.net> [20000831 06:33]:
We thought it best not to include specific exceptions because although we were aware of several possible exceptions, we didn't want people to feel restricted to just those listed. There could've been some we didn't know about and we wanted to wait until we heard from some of the requesting organizations so we could come up with a more comprehensive list of exceptions.
This sounds good as well. My only comment would be that while I see the logic behind this, I'd add that even if ARIN does not want to include specific exceptions in the rule, it might be best to discuss and perhaps *informally* have a list of specific ones. This will help the IP community feel a bit
This was supposed to say "...specific ones before passing the rule." Oops. -jr ---- Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN] <jrichard@cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us/geekresearch.com> Geek Research LLC IP Network Engineering and Consulting