On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:
First, the NANOG list will now be moderated by a volunteer group that includes Marty Hannigan, Steve Gibbard, and Chris Malayter. Many thanks to these folks for taking on this role in upholding the list's AUP. Leaving silly disclaimers aside, how did you collect candidates? How were these candidates selected? Who selected them?
Reforms are nice, but unless I missed something, the main point you were speaking of was more visibility how of things are done. Why not let the community chose it's own side of the leadership, after all, nobody is contending:
Speaking only for myself (and certainly not for Merit): The NANOG Reform group (http://www.nanog-reform.org), which has already gone on record supporting an open and democratic NANOG, was asked for volunteers. I think all three of us are looking at this as a temporary assignment until the broader issues of NANOG governance are sorted out. -Steve