25 Sep
2011
25 Sep
'11
5:37 a.m.
I found I had to do this many years ago on some Cisco routers to get them to load balance (per packet) across two links. Adding 0.0.0.0/0 routes across both links just resulted in traffic routing across one link. Broke it into two /1's per link and it worked perfectly. On 24 September 2011 02:12, Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have seen a few operators adding static routes like: 0.0.0.0/1 some next-hop and 128.0.0.0/1 some next-hop.
Why would anyone want to add such static routes? What does 0.0.0.0/1 mean. Note that the netmask is 1 and not 0.
Thanks, Glen