Mark Tinka wrote:
On 25/Jan/16 12:15, Joe Maimon wrote:
No static routes, dedicated BGP routed loopbacks on each side from an allocated /31, strict definitions on which routes belong to which session. Its gone about very properly.
And all of this is simpler than having a native BGP session that runs across a point-to-point link?
Maybe not for some people, but I have a hard time understanding why one extra ebgp session is such a novel concept for all you networking folk.
My philosophy: if I could run a router with only one command in its configuration, I would.
They sell those routers at your nearest staples, they require zero commands.
Personally, I abhor tunnels (and things that resemble them) as well as centralized networking. But that's just me.
I know you know better. What does this have to do with tunnels? Or how centralized your network is built or not? Joe