-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 william(at)elan.net wrote:
I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Tyrone Chickenbone wrote:
ne one able to reach0r this site, it appearz to be d0wnz0rs!!! sev0!!! 0h n0z!!! supply of cirpple and midget scat pix0rz gone!!!1
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
right #nanog is 3 doors down to the left loaded with kiddies that simply don't matter to network infrastructure. Also could we please quickly kill this thread as it's utterly unimportant. - -- Andrew D Kirch | Abusive Hosts Blocking List | www.ahbl.org Security Admin | Summit Open Source Development Group | www.sosdg.org Key fingerprint = 4106 3338 1F17 1E6F 8FB2 8DFA 1331 7E25 C406 C8D2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDqaDpEzF+JcQGyNIRAtf8AJ40sxmaE01kYBPO/9a90Q0MRjULFgCgmNw5 1A7XistyQphKs2bvMRZqaFs= =3CF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----