Hmm, how can they prove it to _any_ court? They have not right to come in and look around. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Hollis" <goemon@anime.net> To: "Marc Pierrat" <marc@sunchar.com> Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com>; "Jon Mansey" <jon@interpacket.net>; <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:27 PM Subject: Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money spent on this witch hunt.
At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
-Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]