Peter Galbavy wrote:
According to information provided to me, 9netave is in no uncertain terms is refusing to take down the site without a court order.
Beware... ... The provider is waiting for an external agency (the courts) to take
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 07:52:32PM -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote: the responsibility for saying that the site should be removed. When I was at Demon, we had a strict policy of not submitting to any third party requests WRT user account except those either demanded by law, or those events that clearly breach our AUP - which has the force of law, as part of the terms and conditions of service.
So 9netave has no AUP prohibiting use of its services for conducting scams? I would not want to run my web site at a hoster that could become blocked by many ISPs. But then, I'd never use 9netave for many reasons. -- Phil Howard KA9WGN phil@intur.net phil@ipal.net