niek@asbak.coding-slaves.com (Niek) writes:
One could also put together a list based on: - Security holes.
in BIND9-- zero so far.
- Amount of code
in BIND9-- % find . -name '*.[chyl]' -print | xargs wc -l | awk '{X+=$1} END {print X}' 687674
- Bloatness
in BIND9-- none.
- Seperation of functionality
in BIND9-- you got me on this one, we have one daemon that does everything.
- # of seconds it takes to load huge amounts of zones
in BIND9-- you got me on this one. in BIND9.3.1-- better but not good enough, BIND9.4 will be better still.
In the end, it all comes down to religion:
no.
Bind people don't ack djb points and vice versa.
i don't ack djb's existence, not merely his "points." i'm happy to ack your points, and debate them, though. -- Paul Vixie