22 Nov
2010
22 Nov
'10
5:24 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 18:33, Daniel Hagerty <hag@linnaean.org> wrote:
Ambiguating usages like "Take the least signifigant quad of that ipv6 address" to mean either 16 bits or 64 bits, when it currently is unamibigously 64 bits won't make the lives of C/C++ programmers writing IPv6 code any easier.
Agreed. Thanks a lot for pointing this out. Comments like this are incredibly valuable to me. I think I will still add quad to -03 as it has been requested a lot of times, but more to point out and document that there is a significant problem with it than anything else. Thanks again, Richard