On 12 Mar 2010, at 1:34, Kevin Loch wrote:
Axel Morawietz wrote:
Am 12.03.2010 17:03, schrieb Nathan:
[...] Its amazing how prolific 1.x traffic is.
one reason might also be, that at least T-Mobile Germany uses 1.2.3.* for their proxies that deliver the content to mobile phones. And I'm not sure what they are doing when they are going to receive this route from external. ;)
If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years, perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?
Marla and I have drafted a document examining the issues associated with designating additional private address space: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issue... Please let us know if you have suggestions for improvements to the document. Leo