22 Mar
2014
22 Mar
'14
7:51 p.m.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 22/03/2014 19:35, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
CGN also comes with lots of downside that customers are likely to find unpleasant. For some operators, customer (dis)satisfaction might be the driver that ultimately forces them to deploy IPv6.
don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol translation is any less ugly than CGN.
True, but the ugliness of NAT64 and friends will decrease over time as more people go v6. The ugliness of IPv4 in general, and CGN/LSN will likely increase over time as people have to jump through more NAT hoops to reach an increasingly ugly/fragmented IPv4 Internet. jms