15 Jul
2015
15 Jul
'15
4:23 p.m.
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant address space.
There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with stupid allocation policies.
True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that this is likely?
What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f*** were they thinking".