Because my signalling proposal is flawed without DNSSEC as Brandon Martin pointed out.

So if we move the signalling part to another record type, then we may have to deal with multiple record set signatures. Also there is one more configuration for the end user. But i'm open for suggestions. 

To the person who trolled me. I'm here to have some intellectual conversation. So please stop trolling me. You are an engineer. So don't behave like a teen in youtube comments section.  I'm proposing these stuffs, so the world can benefit something. By trolling me, you are just killing that.

To everyone else, please go easy on me. If I'm little off on something, please forgive my ignorance. The reason I'm here is because you all know these stuffs better than me. I'm here to get some feedback. 

If you all think opening a new port is waste of time, I'm ok with that. But if you see some benefits on Implicit TLS over Opportunistic TLS, please point that out too. 

Thank you for your time.