On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Corbe <dcorbe@hammerfiber.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dcorbe@hammerfiber.com');>> wrote:
Maybe we should let people believe that IPv6 is faster than IPv4 even if objectively that isn’t true. Perhaps that will help speed along the adoption process.
do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6 deployment on the slow-boat?
YMMV, but the majority of my customers are ipv6. And for those customers with ipv6, 73% of their traffic is e2e IPv6. I agree that there are many dark corners of Santa Cruz without IPv6, but the story is: the whales of content and eyeballs are on IPv6, and it is cheaper (no cgn) and faster (RUM data) than the ipv4 alternative. Does it really matter what single digit % of Alexa 1M has a AAAA?