From georgeb@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 17:48:31 2011 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:48:32 -0700 Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet From: "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>, nanog@nanog.org
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
*every* ASN? Oh my. ;)
No, not an *unqualified* "every ASN". Merely every one that is 'publicly visible' at any 'signficiant' point on the network. <*GRIN*>
I would qualify that a bit to say "every ASN available at every peering point at which the provider appears".
I wrote it the way I did, because I expressly did not want that loophole. If a provider claims they provide 'complete' Internet acess, the idea is to require _complete_ access.