It's possibly the MCI WorldCom operations syndrome: "Ignore the issue, then construct a plausible excuse if the issue does not go away!"

Please wait for the excuse. Its coming.  -;)

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From:   Craig Holland [mailto:cholland@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent:   Friday, September 29, 2000 11:19 AM
To:     Hank Nussbacher; nanog@merit.edu
Subject:        RE: UUnet trouble ticket and response time




Ya...I have many circuits w/ UUNet, and I've noticed a considerable drop in
their 'help-desk' responce.  Hell, I don't even get an email back anymore
saying that they received my email.  It seems I find routing issues before
they do, and when I do, they don't even let me know if they are working on
them or anything.

craig

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Hank Nussbacher
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:35 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: UUnet trouble ticket and response time
>
>
>
> Apologies in advance:
>
> Uunet placed a route object in RADB with origin AS701, even
> though the /24
> belonged to us and messed up certain routings in certain places.  So we
> sent them the problem and got issued a trouble ticket (UU2282116) on Sept
> 9.  Till today, even after repeated emails to them on this TT, we
> received
> not a single response over the course of 3 weeks.  In the end, MERIT went
> in and removed the brain-dead /24 route object.
>
> Is this how UUnet operates these days?
>
> -Hank
>
>