On 16/Apr/15 07:25, Tore Anderson wrote:
We're in a similar situation here; transit prices has come down so much in recent years (while IX fees are indeed stagnant) that I am certain that if I were to cut all peering and buy everything from a regional tier-2 instead, I'd be lowering my total MRC somewhat, without really reducing connectivity quality to my (former) peers.
I wouldn't say exchange point prices are stagnant, per se. They may remain the same, but what goes up is the port bandwidth. It's not directly linear, but you get my point. Again, the burden is on the peering members to extract the most out of their peering links by having as much peering as possible. Route servers at the exchange points have played a huge role in facilitating this, but the final stretch involves getting in touch with a bunch of members to setup bi-lateral sessions, with no guarantee they will agree, or if they do, may not peer their entire network, not taking into account whether they will do this for free or not. Perhaps the next bunch of exchange point operators will be those who play a more active role in facilitating peering across all members, so as to keep traffic on their switch fabric and away from transit providers. But that is probably a zero-sum game, as their involvement will just mean more salaries that need to get paid, leading to an increase in membership fees. Mark.