On 8 Nov 2011, at 18:24, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for routing security have been a help in this event?
SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't intended to be nor can it possibly be a remedy for vendor-specific implementation problems.
Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in SIDR/DANE architecture, implementation, and deployment. But at the end of the day, vendors are still responsible for their own code.
Indeed, we can expect new and exciting ways to blow up networks with SIDR. -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________