Using Orifice 342 will hurt you. Packet loss (the more the better) will only help you. -- The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2019 15:50 To: Robert Webb Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: QoS for Office365
On 8/Jul/19 21:03, Robert Webb wrote:
I took the OP's request as for doing QoS at the edge of their network and not necessarily the entire path.
Indeed, but even then, you could be handing off the traffic to a downstream customer, and can't guarantee what they do to those ToS fields.
As another person stated, the real answer is to add more bandwidth
if
you are having to QoS to Office365 because it is affecting other internet based services.
Yes and no.
More bandwidth never hurt anyone, but packet loss in the remote network toward the cloud will hurt you.
Mark.