On Mar 2, 2018, at 3:17 AM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> writes:
What can you do with ULA that GUA isn’t suitable for?
1) get 2) keep 3) move
Wrong. 1) get Easy as going to http://tunnelbroker.net <http://tunnelbroker.net/> and filling out a form. Remember to check the box for your /48. 2) keep Admittedly, you might have to connect to your tunnel every once in a while to keep it alive, but that’s hardly a high bar. 3) move If you’re not talking to the internet with it (which you can’t with ULA, theoretically), you can move that same HE /48 anywhere you want, with the additional advantage that you can, if you need to, connect your tunnel and actually make it work on the internet too.
Granted, many of us can do that with GUAs too. But with ULA those features are avaible to everyone everywhere. Which is useful for a
You really think that doing ULA according to the RFCs (collision avoidance algorithm and all) is easier than filling out a form at HE? REALLY?
number of applications where you care mostly about the local environment and not so much about global connectivity.
I hear you, but I’m not convinced about the ease. Owen