12 May
2007
12 May
'07
11:15 p.m.
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:43:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote: [snip]
Too bad the PC hasn't solicited a talk in this area. They ought to.
Too bad that the collective-we choose to beat up the PC for not providing agenda information in advance, and then change tack to beat them up when the increased transparency of incremental information for confirmed talks doesn't cover current timely issues such as earthquake impact or regulatory vagaries. Rather than assuming, suggestions for ways to provide insight to agenda works-in-progress would be useful. Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE